Interpretation of Laws according to Islamic Injunctions: A Statutory Obligation with Special Reference to Family Law

Authors

  • Ayesha Maria International Islamic University
  • Dr Saqib Jawad District & Session Courts, Islamabad

Abstract

Pakistan is a state created in the name of Islam. Since independence, a struggle started for Islamization of laws. Attempts were made by the Parliament and several provisions were inserted in the constitutions as well as other laws to bring them in conformity with Islamic injunctions. However, multi-cultural societal norms and earlier colonialism were the main challenges in this regard. Until the 1980s, the main source of any Islamic law was the Parliament but thereafter many scholars have noted that the Federal Shariat Court became the primary source for Islamization of law and in absence of any political leadership or societal consensus, the actual determinant for the Islamization of laws in Pakistan are the courts. Various Islamic provisions have been inserted in the Constitution and other laws including Articles 2-A and 227 of the Constitution, but all of them cannot be declared Islamic, unless they are interpreted by the courts in accordance with Islamic injunctions. On the hand, provisions declared against the injunctions of Islam can also be interpreted in the light of Islamic injunctions. Article 227 of the Constitution impliedly and Section 4 of the Enforcement of Shari’ah Act, 1991 expressly cast a duty on courts to take the judicial notice of the provisions of laws and interpret them in accordance with Islamic law. The matter also came before the Apex Court of Pakistan in Hakim Khan etc. v Government of Pakistan etc. (PLD 1992 SC 559), wherein it was held that any question regarding any provision of the Constitution being against the injunctions of Islam shall be referred to the Parliament, which is the sole authority to bring it in conformity with the injunctions of Islam. According to Prof. Imran Ahsan Khan Niyazee, the matter could have been solved easily if it was interpreted in accordance with the injunctions of Islam by declaring that Article 45 is not applicable in Qisas. Therefore, interpretation of any law by the courts is very important and this paper attempts to highlight the need, scope, mode and problems of interpretation of laws in accordance with Islamic injunctions with special reference to family laws.

References

Shahzado Shaikh, Political History of Muslim Law in Indo-Pak Sub-Continent, (Karachi: Sindhica Academy, 2012), 12.

Saqib Jawad, “Anglicization of Islāmic Law in the Sub-Continent and its Impact on the Legal System of Pakistan”, ‘Ulūm-e-Islāmia Vol. 26, No. 02, 8.

Merriam Webster Dictionary, available at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anglicize, last accessed on 02-01-2021.

Shahzado Shaikh, Political History of Muslim Law in Indo-Pak Sub-Continent, (Karachi: Sindhica Academy, 2012), 25.

Shahzado Shaikh, Political History of Muslim Law in Indo-Pak Sub-Continent, (Karachi: Sindhica Academy, 2012), 25.

Allah Rakha and others v Federation of Pakistan and others, PLD 2000 Federal Shariat Court 1.

Matthew J. Nelson, Islamic Law in an Islamic Republic: What Role for Parliament?, The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, (Cambridge, 2015), 6-7.

Article 227 (1) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973.

Matthew J. Nelson, Islamic Law in an Islamic Republic: What Role for Parliament?, The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, (Cambridge, 2015), 6-7.

Article 203D (1) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973.

Matthew J. Nelson, Islamic Law in an Islamic Republic: What Role for Parliament?, The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, (Cambridge, 2015), 6-7.

Section 4 of the Enforcement of Shari’ah Act, 1991.

Section 338-F of Pakistan Penal Code.

PLD 2001 Lah. 105.

PLD 2003 Quetta 122.

PLD 2006 SC 53.

P.S.C. (Crl.) 152.

PLD 2006 SC 53.

Tahir Wasti, the Application of Islamic Criminal Law in Pakistan Sharia in Practice, (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009), 179.

PLD 1991 Lah. 347.

PLD 1989 Karachi 171.

Tahir Wasti, the Application of Islamic Criminal Law in Pakistan Sharia in Practice, (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009), 189-191.

Ali Shan Shah, Muhammad Waris and Abdul Basit, “Islamization in Pakistan: A Critical Analysis of Zia’s Regime”, Global Regional Review, Vol. I, No. I (2016), 260 ‒ 270, 265.

Rubya Mehdi, the Islamization of the Law in Pakistan, (Routledge, 1994).

Lucy Carroll, “The Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961: Provisions and Procedures- a reference paper for current research”, Contributions to Indian Society, Vol. 13, No. 1 (1979), 117.

Carroll, Lucy. "The Pakistan Federal Shariat Court, Section 4 of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, and the Orphaned Grandchild." Islamic Law and Society, vol. 9, no. 1 (2002): 70-82, 70.

Mst. Sultana Begum v Abdul Ghaffar, 2018 YLR 2685 Karachi. See also Jamroz Khan v Aamir Khan, 2013 CLC 542 Peshawar and Rashida Bibi v Maqbool Begum, 2006 MLD 1138 Lahore.

Mst. Sarwar Jan v Mukhtar Ahmad, 2012 PLD SC 217.

Muhammad Murad v Allah Bakhsh, 2006 MLD 286 Lahore.

Zaina v Kamal Khan, 1990 PLD 1051 Supreme Court.

Muhammad Munir, “Talaq and the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961 in Pakistan: An Analysis”, Spectrum of International Law, (2011), Vol. 1, 16-18, May-August 2011 , Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1925704, last accessed on 06-01-2021.

Syed Ali Nawaz Gardezi v. Lt.-Col. Muhammad Yusuf, PLD 1963 SC 51.

Mst. Kaneez Fatima v. Wali Muhammad, PLD 1993 SC 901.

Mst. Farah Naz v. Judge Family Court, PLD 1993 SC 901.

Downloads

Published

12-10-2021

How to Cite

Maria, A., & Jawad, S. (2021). Interpretation of Laws according to Islamic Injunctions: A Statutory Obligation with Special Reference to Family Law. Zia E Tahqeeq, 11(21), 11–21. Retrieved from http://ziaetahqeeq.com/index.php/zt/article/view/13